![]() I want my machine fixed immediately or a new machine. I have spent countless hours at the laundry mat over the past 9 weeks and countless hours on hold with Speed Queen. I have gotten no where in calling Speed Queen. Something that could have been ordered back on July 20th if they had listed to what the *** service rep that was out the first time when the machine sparked. On this call Speed Queen decided it was the board that needed replaced also. I told them to call Speed Queen service and determine next steps. ![]() Again when the machine was plugged in the outlet sparked. On August 24th *** Technologies came back with another heating element and installed it. They determined we only needed a new heating element even though *** Technologies advised them the board needed replaced. On July 24th *** Technologies was told to return to my house and place a call with Speed Queen's service department to diagnose the machine. When the correct heating element was installed and the machine was plugged in the outlet and the unit sparked along with tripping the breaker. A new part was ordered and *** Technologies returned on July 20th. On July 12th, *** Technologies came back to the house only to determine they ordered the wrong part. They determined it was the heating element and placed an order for the part. They sent a service tech from *** Technologies on June 28th, 2023 to diagnose the machine. On June 20th, 2023 I placed a service call with Speed Queen due to my dryer not heating. I purchased a speed queen dryer on August 29, 2021. To date, Respondent has neither complied with the order to correct the violation by transitioning its license to NMLS. The Citation included an order to correct the violation and an order to pay an administrative fine in the amount of $2,500.00 to the Commissioner by September 20, 2022.Ĭomplainant served the Citation on Respondent via certified mail on Jand by electronic mail at Respondent's Designated Email Address on September 27, 2022. Accordingly, Complainant issued a Citation on that date pursuant to Financial Code section 22707.5, subdivision (a). Had not transitioned management of its CFL license to NMLS as of July 22, 2022. Complainant provided further notice of this requirement over the telephone - Complainant made at least two calls to the designated telephone number provided by each CFL licensee, including Respondent - between February 1 and March 15, 2022.Ĭomplainant determined that Respondent was in violation of Regulation 1422.4 and Complainant also provided notice via email to each CFL licensee that had not yet transitioned to NMLS, including Respondent, on March 7, 2022, and again via email and mail on March 28, 2022. On March 7, 2022, Complainant again extended the deadline to transition to NMLS to March 31, 2022.Ĭomplainant provided notice of this requirement to Respondent - via email to the Designated Email Address of each CFL licensee on July 20, 2021, September 16, 2021, October 14, 2021, November 8, 2021, and December 16, 2021. On December 16, 2021, Complainant extended the deadline to transition to NMLS to March 15, 2022. Under California Code of Regulations, Title 10, Section 1422.4 (Regulation 1422.4), which went into effect on October 1, 2021,all CFL licensees were required to transition to the Nationwide Multistate Licensing System and Registry (NMLS) by December 31, 2021. The Department of Financial Protection and Innovation alleges, and charges as follows: ![]() JanuThe following describes a Consent Order that has been formally brought by a government agency. Government Action: BBB reports on known government actions involving business’ marketplace conduct: Gov.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |